The language used in the judgment is also instructive11. Jallikattu supreme court judgement my first encounter of jallikattu happened in the year 2010. Jun 15, 2014 yet, court has made this tnrj act invalid, and the supreme court judge has struck down this act. Act, the tamil nadu regulation of jallikattu act, 2009 for short. Jallikattu is a bulltaming sport played in tamil nadu as a part of the pongal harvest festival. The supreme court had on january 21, last year refused to reexamine its 2014 judgement banning the use of bulls for jallikattu events or bullockcart races across the country. How would jallikattu supporters explain the supreme courts.
Based on such a report, whose veracity is questionable, the judgement is given. Feb 11, 2017 justice ks radhakrishnan, who delivered the landmark judgment banning bulltaming sport jallikattu, has moved the supreme court against a notice issued by the madurai bench of madras high court in. Jan 20, 2017 having read the document type by sc on the issue, i would like to highlight the points both scientifically, logically and legally. Jan 22, 2017 in may 2014, with its jallikattu verdict, the supreme court bench of justice as he was then k. Many youngsters and jallikattu supporters are protesting against this decision by supreme court to remove the ban on jallikattu. Ancient texts such as upanishads can certainly be relied upon by courts while deciding legal principles, said the supreme court monday as it dismissed a petition by the tamil nadu government to reconsider a decision on banning jallikattu. Jan 31, 2017 the question whether the sport or the festival of jallikattu and the subsequent amendment to the protection of animals from cruelty act, 1960 takes away the basis of the 2014 judgement of the supreme court in the case of nagaraja, it said. We have two sets of cases here, one set challenges the division bench judgment of the madras high court at madurai dated 09. The supreme court today referred matters related to the bulltaming sport jallikattu to a constitution bench. We have two sets of cases here, one set challenges the division bench judgment of the madras high court at madurai dated 9320071, filed by the animal welfare board of india for short awbi, writ petition c no. The supreme court judge, ks radhakarishnan received the peta man of the year award for his 2014 judgment banning jallikattu.
Supreme court turns down plea to revisit jallikattu ban. Supreme court refuses to reconsider order banning jallikattu. What are the reasons provided in the jallikattu judgement. It had also stayed the january 8 notification of centre and questioned the centre over the notification allowing use of bulls in events like jallikattu, saying that its 2014. Five reasons why the supreme court verdict may go against. The supreme court has agreed to delay its verdict on jallikattu for a week following the centres. The supreme court has to rule on the legal validity of a 2016 notification issued by the centre on allowing jallikattu and bullock cart races in the country under certain conditions. Judgement of the supreme court of india regarding jallikattu. The reason mentioned by the supreme court was that it is brutal and against the spirit of the prevention of cruelty to the animals act.
When the supreme court banned the practice of jallikattu in 2014, it alluded to various sections of the pca act, 1960, which addresses unnecessary suffering of animals. The supreme court on wednesday banned tamil nadus centuriesold jallikattu bull fights. On friday, supreme court has referred to a constitution bench the issue to decide whether the people of. The use of bulls and bullocks in exhibitions, for example, jallikattu, bullock.
Vanakam greetings, as many of know that supreme court has banned jallikattu and peta was one the people who was responsible for that. Justice ks radhakrishnan moves sc against madras hc notice on. Supreme court refers jallikattu challenge to constitution bench. Supreme court refuses to pass judgment on jallikattu before. The supreme court turned down a plea seeking its intervention in passing a judgment on jallikattu before saturday, news agency ani reported. Supreme court jallikattu judgment scanned copy pages 1 to. The court held that use of bulls in such events severely harmed the animals and constituted an offence under the prevention of cruelty to the animals act. Jallikattu is recently in news because of the supreme court rulings, government interventions and agitations from the public against the jallikattu ban. The supreme court on friday referred to a constitution bench to decide whether the people of tamil nadu and maharashtra can conserve jallikattu and bullockcart races as their cultural right and. The supreme has held that the sport is inherently cruel in nature and this deprives the animal of its basic right to live without subject to fear and torture. Division bench judgment of the madras high court at madurai. Jan 20, 2017 the supreme court agreed not to pass judgement for a week on the jallikattu issue. Jallikattu press conference details yugaparivartan.
Ghose stretched the fundamental right to include every species. Supreme court agrees to centres request, defers its judgment by a week attorney general mukul rohatgi said the delay will give the union and state governments time to resolve the. After the case was filed in court to ban jallikattu, these three people, who are associated with these organizations are appointed to file the report. Sep 02, 2016 the honble supreme court in the case of shenoy and co. Supreme court to hear all petitions on jallikattu on 31.
Judges of the supreme court of india have likewise criticized the indian central governments support of jallikattu just because it is a tradition and have voiced their opposition of it. Nov 16, 2016 the court in its 2014 judgement had said that bulls cannot be used as performing animals, either for jallikattu events or bullockcart races in the states of tamil nadu, maharashtra or elsewhere. Jallikattu or sallikkattu, also known as eru thazhuvuthal and mancuvirattu, is a traditional. A bench of chief justice dipak misra and justice rf nariman framed five. In this post, lets analyze, jallikattu and other important issues associated with it in detail.
Justice rohinton fali nariman, in a judgement was authored by justice nariman for the bench, formulated the. In may 2014, the indian supreme court had struck down he tamil nadu regulation of jallikattu act, 2009, and had banned the practice altogether along with bullockcart racing in both tamil nadu and maharashtra. Supreme court of india has upheld its ban on the jallikuttu bull tamingbull fighting sport in tamilnadu. Insights mind maps page 1 jallikattu protests 1 introduction jallikattu is referred as bull taming event typically practiced in tamil nadu as a part of pongal celebrations on mattu pongal day it is renowned as an ancient sport, believed to have been practised some 2500 years ago. Here are five reasons why the supreme court, which banned jallikattu in 2014 on grounds of cruelty to animals, may find it hard to rule in favour of the traditional sport. The centre submitted that people of tamil nadu are passionate about the sport and it was in talks with the state. The jallikattu case in the supreme court is closed. The supreme court today referred matters related to the bulltaming.
Jan 24, 2017 in a series of coordinated moves that resemble a tagteam, the centre together with the tamil nadu government has managed to close the lone jallikattu case in the supreme court. Cto 1985 155 itr 178, has held that the law laid down by the supreme court is binding on all, notwithstanding the fact that it is against a state or a private party. Supreme court jallikattu judgment scanned copy pages 1 to 20. Union of india and others 2001 6 scc 84, which upheld the notification. Jallikattu is a bulltaming sport practiced during the tamil festival of pongal. Feb 02, 2018 the court in its 2014 judgement had said bulls cannot be used as performing animals, either for jallikattu events or bullockcart races in tamil nadu, maharashtra or elsewhere in the country and. Sc bans jallikattu bull fights in tamil nadu the times of india may 7, 2014, inshare the court also struck down a 2011 tamil nadu law regulating the conduct of jallikattu.
Nagaraja 6, the court stated, forcing a bull and keeping it in the waiting area for. In response to the protests against the bullfighting sport, the supreme court of india banned jallikattu in may 2014. Like this, several issues are there in this judgement. The peta petition contends that the 2017 jallikattu act and rules violate. Jan 23, 2016 jallikattu supreme court judgement my first encounter of jallikattu happened in the year 2010. What is jallikattu 5 things that make it controversial.
Jallikattu is a bull taming event practiced in tamil nadu as a part of pongal celebrations. Justice ks radhakrishnan moves sc against madras hc notice. Apr 27, 2016 jallikattu and other animal races and fights are prohibited. Alluding to section 3 and section 11, the honble court declared that. The court in its 2014 judgement had said that bulls cannot be used as performing animals, either for jallikattu events or bullockcart races in the states of tamil nadu, maharashtra or elsewhere. Supreme court refuses stay on tamil nadu law permitting.
But activists alleged that the sport caused a lot of deaths and injuries to both the bulls and the participants. It says that jallikattu, which is a sport in tamil nadu, will be banned from now on. In the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction versus. Nagaraja judgment, the supreme court held jallikattu as cruelty to bulls. Fali nariman, in a judgement was authored by justice nariman for the bench. On friday, supreme court has referred to a constitution bench the issue to. Jallikattu or sallikkattu, also known as eru thazhuvuthal and mancuvirattu, is a traditional event in which a bull bos indicus, such as the pulikulam or kangayam breeds, is released into a crowd of people, and multiple human participants attempt to grab the large hump on the bulls back with both arms and hang on to it while the bull attempts to escape. Jan 12, 2016 by a judgement in may 2014, the top court had prohibited the use of bulls in jallikattu festivals, holding this practice to be an offence under the law. Why should tamil nadu listen to supreme court verdict on. The hindu 8 may 2014 supreme court bans jallikattu in tamil.
Supreme court rejects plea for jallikattu judgement. The verdict imposed a complete ban on jallikattu, bullockcart. Regulation of jallikattu act, 2009 for short tnrj act and the notification dated 11. Supreme court refers jallikattu challenge to constitution. Nov 16, 2015 the supreme court of india purported a milestone judgment in the matter titled animal welfare board of india vs. Jan 12, 2017 on july 26, 2016, the supreme court had said jallikattu may be 5,000 years old, but it was for the judiciary to decide whether the practice could continue. Tamil nadu government got a reprieve on january 31, with the supreme court refusing to stay, at this stage, the tamil nadu governments law permitting jallikattu in the state as a.
May 21, 2014 what does the supreme court judgment say. Supreme court of india has banned jallikattu on may 7, 2014. The hindu 8 may 2014 supreme court bans jallikattu in. Jallikattu verdict spurred a flood of animal rights cases in. Jan 20, 2017 the supreme court had on january 21 last year refused to reexamine its 2014 judgement banning use of bulls for jallikattu events or bullockcart races across the country.
Sc refers pleas against jallikattu to constitution bench. Insights mind maps insights on india homepage insights. Jallikattu was traditionally played during the annual pongal celebrations and had a lot of cultural significance. Supreme court of india banned jallikattu ground report. Dec 12, 2017 the supreme court banned jallikattu in 2014 after activists said it constitutes extreme animal cruelty in the sport that involves young men wrestling with bulls to celebrate the harvest. An inspection by peta india and animal rahat in january 2016 exposed the cruelty bombarded on bulls during ranging from throwing chilly powder in eyes to hitting the animals with barbed sticks. An inspection by peta india and animal rahat in january 2016 exposed the cruelty bombarded on bulls during ranging from throwing chilly powder in eyes to. This is a violation of supreme court and madurai high. It was a travel to alanganallur jallikattu with two of my fellow photographers prabhakar,naveen. Devastating effect of banning jallikattu the jallikattu bulls, numbering around 600 to 100 would be sold by bull owners, and end up in slaughter house. Supreme court not to pass jallikattu verdict for a week. Bench to decide whether tamil nadu and maharashtra can conserve jallikattu and bullock cart races as their cultural right and demand their. Supreme court not to pass jallikattu verdict for a week the.
1041 1486 682 1527 1435 1565 1249 890 94 203 151 1269 133 1503 1313 1284 682 639 665 1416 823 1463 496 435 761 1422 1320 18 297 512 405 870 697 1310 305 996 664 653 1492 575